PDA

View Full Version : yet more stupidity


GoodChris
08-18-2003, 02:17 PM
Anyone else read this?



Calif. couple, firm indicted on obscenity charges in Pa.

Thursday, August 07, 2003

By Dan Nephin, The Associated Press







A California couple and their company have been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly distributing obscene materials in what federal authorities said would be a series of prosecutions after nearly a decade of lax enforcement.

Robert Zicari and Janet Romano, both of Northridge, and their company, Extreme Associates, were indicted for allegedly distributing three videos to the Pittsburgh area through the mail and over the Internet, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan said today.

Buchanan said lack of enforcement has led to the proliferation of violent and degrading images such as distributed by Extreme Associates. One of the videos depicts rape and murder, she said.

Obscenity is not protected speech under the First Amendment, she said.

Authorities raided Extreme Associates in April and took videos and financial records, she said.

Zicari and Romano, who also go by the names Rob Black and Lizzie Borden, have not been incarcerated but have surrendered their passports and must appear at an arraignment hearing in Pittsburgh on Aug. 27.

Court documents did not name an attorney for Zicari and Romano and they could not immediately be reached for comment. Home phone listings could not be found for them and a telephone call by The Associated Press to Extreme Associates and an e-mail were not immediately answered.

The charges carry a maximum penalty of 50 years in prison and a $2.5 million fine for Zicari and Romano and probation and a $5 million fine for the company, Buchanan said.

Evil Chris
08-18-2003, 02:30 PM
Chris, what makes this particular porn raid by the authorities any different from others?

Why are they stupid?

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 04:02 PM
The Stupidity is on the part of Rob Black and Lizzie Borden for making and distributing movies that contain scenes of simulated Rape and Murder.

That is the stupidity. This is why legit pornographers get a bad rap. Stupidity like that.

NetRodent
08-18-2003, 06:47 PM
What would you expect from someone named Lizzie Borden?

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 06:50 PM
Originally posted by GoodChris
The Stupidity is on the part of Rob Black and Lizzie Borden for making and distributing movies that contain scenes of simulated Rape and Murder.



I hope they go after that bastard Clint Eastwodd then, he's had a couple movies with simulated rape and murder.......

:rolleyes:

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy
I hope they go after that bastard Clint Eastwodd then, he's had a couple movies with simulated rape and murder.......

:rolleyes:


Now you're just being plain 'ol silly.:invalid: :topic:

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 06:59 PM
Originally posted by GoodChris
Now you're just being plain 'ol silly.:invalid: :topic:

How? are we talking about the quality of the movie? I can go to amazon.com and buy a LOT of movies containing simulated rape and murder.....

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy
How? are we talking about the quality of the movie? I can go to amazon.com and buy a LOT of movies containing simulated rape and murder.....

Because the movies in which they got busted for also include hardcore pornography. When you mix the 2 of em, you get problems. Porn is already facing issues of obscenity.

Yes I agree its all BS, but thats the way it is right now, why force the limits right now, its stupidity.

But thats the way it is in the 'free world'

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by GoodChris
Because the movies in which they got busted for also include hardcore pornography. When you mix the 2 of em, you get problems. Porn is already facing issues of obscenity.

Yes I agree its all BS, but thats the way it is right now, why force the limits right now, its stupidity.

But thats the way it is in the 'free world'

Just curious, have you seen the movies in question?

Also, these weren't movies that were just made. If I remember right, the movies in question were made last year.

Truth is though, we NEED envelope pushers. Where would be without Larry Flynt pushing envelopes and boundaries?

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 07:09 PM
Ever seen this movie

Irreversible (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00009W0U4/qid=1061248095/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/002-2576760-1984059?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846)

it has a very violent and graphic rape scene, an extreme head bashing in with a fire extiguisher and even a fairly explicit scene in a gay SnM club. Ooh, look, it even has a special discount price on Amazon.com

saus
08-18-2003, 08:11 PM
Chris..
this one is about a bit dated (two weeks almost) but a major blow!
A full sting operation was setup by the FBI who ordered the movies specifically by internet mail order to make the bust!

the 1st of what looks to be a BUSY year in osbcenity charges for studios & sellers alike : (

Be careful where you ship your goods too, and just as careful what states & towns your memberships are coming from because its is clearly 'fair game season' on adult on the net.

Mister X
08-18-2003, 08:46 PM
If you're going to make shit like that you might as well hang a sign around your neck saying "Headline Making Bust".

To be honest I think they deserve what they get. You can't get much more disgusting than the stuff they apparently make. And the stupidity... Apparently the bust came about because they were in a documentary thing on PBS Frontline and described the action in the video in detail. Morons.

As far as whether or not it's different than a regular Hollywood movie... Of course it is. Most people don't sit and jackoff to Dirty Harry.

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 08:46 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy
Just curious, have you seen the movies in question?

Also, these weren't movies that were just made. If I remember right, the movies in question were made last year.

Truth is though, we NEED envelope pushers. Where would be without Larry Flynt pushing envelopes and boundaries?


the fundamental problem here is that in a mainstream movie, typically, rape is not glorified. When you are pushing a movie through the XXX channels and include RAPE and Death as the theme, it will become seen as an association which will please the church to no ends. They have been trying to associate porn with rape for years, and now Mr. Black IS associating it, fake or not.

It is a stupid move in today's climate. Whether the movie is a year old, a week old or a 100 years old, he was still distributing it and it was a stupid move.

Sure we need envelope pushers to get realistic laws in place, but this shit is just stupid. Do you really want Porn associated with death and rape? I sure as hell don't.

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 09:16 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy
Just curious, have you seen the movies in question?

Also, these weren't movies that were just made. If I remember right, the movies in question were made last year.

Truth is though, we NEED envelope pushers. Where would be without Larry Flynt pushing envelopes and boundaries?


the fundamental problem here is that in a mainstream movie, typically, rape is not glorified. When you are pushing a movie through the XXX channels and include RAPE and Death as the theme, it will become seen as an association which will please the church to no ends. They have been trying to associate porn with rape for years, and now Mr. Black IS associating it, fake or not.

It is a stupid move in today's climate. Whether the movie is a year old, a week old or a 100 years old, he was still distributing it and it was a stupid move.

Sure we need envelope pushers to get realistic laws in place, but this shit is just stupid. Do you really want Porn associated with death and rape? I sure as hell don't.

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 09:52 PM
Originally posted by Mister X
If you're going to make shit like that you might as well hang a sign around your neck saying "Headline Making Bust".

To be honest I think they deserve what they get. You can't get much more disgusting than the stuff they apparently make. And the stupidity... Apparently the bust came about because they were in a documentary thing on PBS Frontline and described the action in the video in detail. Morons.

As far as whether or not it's different than a regular Hollywood movie... Of course it is. Most people don't sit and jackoff to Dirty Harry.

My grandmother feels everyone in this industry deserves to go to jail. Shall we let her decide our morality?

To me, their stupidity was in ignoring hostile zip codes.

I would argue that it is no different than a Dirty harry movie. Someone who is going to jack off to rape will do it whether it's in a Rob Black movie or a Clint Eastwood movie. I've seen newsgroups where guiys request just the rape scenes from "hollywood" movies.

What would you have told Larry Flynt when he dared to show pink in his magazines? Remember, this used to be totally taboo and now you can find that stuff for free on TGP galleries.

saus
08-18-2003, 10:01 PM
Extreme Associates is a major player in the Video market,
Their library consists of hundreds of VERY popular films & lines..

Anyone who thinks that this bust happened solely because of those two movies cited in the press release is deluding himself! Other osbcenity charges are coming, they pick the easiest to nail so the precedent is set to mass prosecute afterwards.

What is considered obscene in the USA varies from community to community, meaning you don't have to have death or rape to get nailed, oral sex is considered illegal & obscenity in many states, and as soon as they get a few prosecutions they'll get more daring.

lotta people in this industry living in a bubble!
Free Sites, naked women, tgp, - it's illegal, and until now not enforced, but that is clearly about to change.
Force you to register, process, regulate, and anyone who bucks the trend will do time & pay the fine.

Please don't anyone tell me that having a 19 year old with her ass in the air spanning over 16 images in a gallery for free available to anyone anytime isn't considered osbcenity in 98% of the communities in the USA.. it is. And if its your gallery you're on the hook, and a convincing argument can be made in court that your sponsor is on the hook too for paying you over these last few months. (meaning sponsors are responsible whether they like it or not for all the affiliates under them, just like they are responsible when an affiliate uses spam to promote their programs, they are.. the magic word: Liable.)

Visa has said flat out, don't use us to register age, period. The shit is going to hit the fan hard this year, the big clean up. Makes acacia look like wiener schnitzel! 10% of webmasters know it and see it, the rest are in lala land. If Visa can't regulate age, then who will? Answer, get all the free porn off the net.. or else. COPA is being retabled, if you don't know what COPA is, I'll say it flat out, you have no business being an adult webmaster

2004 - you can take this to bank if bush wins again, the word of the year will be 'liability'.. 7 months after everyone & his mom registered an incorporation in the USA to sell porn. It's gonna be an intense ride!!
Pray the ACLU can stave off the latest rounds.. Ashcroft is coming for us, with Bush, the cowboy who cleaned up the wild west.

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 10:02 PM
Originally posted by GoodChris
the fundamental problem here is that in a mainstream movie, typically, rape is not glorified. When you are pushing a movie through the XXX channels and include RAPE and Death as the theme, it will become seen as an association which will please the church to no ends. They have been trying to associate porn with rape for years, and now Mr. Black IS associating it, fake or not.

It is a stupid move in today's climate. Whether the movie is a year old, a week old or a 100 years old, he was still distributing it and it was a stupid move.

Sure we need envelope pushers to get realistic laws in place, but this shit is just stupid. Do you really want Porn associated with death and rape? I sure as hell don't.

Have you seen this video? The rape is hardly glorified. If you're judging the video based upon not seeing it, you're no different than those who protest everyone else's movies, music and videos that they themselves haven't seen.

Is it something I'm comfortable promoting? Not really, but that's my personal choice. I would never be so arrogant to think that my personal boundaries should be the industry guidelines.

As for the association? I don't really care. They are going to think what they think and it's not going to change their minds. Do you think just because you might have a pretty blonde with sexy lingerie in good lighting with her tits hanging out that it is any different in their minds?

The reason we make money in this business is that we are a taboo. We offer FANTASY. We sell a vice.

GoodChris
08-18-2003, 10:04 PM
Pink and Rape are not of the same category. Showing pink is natural. Taking someone's life and threatening them with terror to the point of submission is a completely different ball game.

Would you want one of these guys that specifically requests rape scenes from movies hanging out with your wife, girlfriend or daughter? On the other hand, the guy that looks at pink, well, hey... he's just like MOST of us.

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 10:11 PM
Originally posted by GoodChris
Pink and Rape are not of the same category. Showing pink is natural. Taking someone's life and threatening them with terror to the point of submission is a completely different ball game.

Would you want one of these guys that specifically requests rape scenes from movies hanging out with your wife, girlfriend or daughter? On the other hand, the guy that looks at pink, well, hey... he's just like MOST of us.

ok, now we're getting somewhere...

it's what MOST of us want...well most of YOU want...majority rules, that's fun. Now, let's test that what MOST want in Oklahoma or Utah.

Actually, I wouldn't want my wife or daughter hanging out with 95% of this industry in the first place.

Would you want a guy who joins a cumshot site near your daughter or wife? Remember, he's joining this site because he wants to see young 18 and 19 year old GIRLS having some ugly, fat fuck dropping a glob of cum on her face so she can write home and tell daddy she's a "real" actress now? Would you want some guy who only wants to see 18 year old runaways get their faces covered in cum or taken in a gangg bang near your wife or daughter?

When Larry Flynt was fighting to show pink in his magazines, many did not think it was natural....hell, I don't think it is. I love the female form, but I'm not really interested in seeing her small intestines. Would you let your wife or daughter near someone who only wanted to see them sperad their lips and play peekaboo with their clit?

SykkBoy
08-18-2003, 10:15 PM
want read stupidity? The GGW guy showed some REAL stupidity...

http://www.xnations.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4371

pornJester
08-19-2003, 09:28 AM
There are alot of adult companies out there that give us all a bad wrap. Whether it be simulated rape or spamming shitty sites for years and producing enough chargebacks to make visa change it's regulations.

Everyone is trying to push the limits at every angle and sooner or later it's all just going to give. :geez:

GoodChris
08-19-2003, 11:05 AM
Pink and Rape are not of the same category. Showing pink is natural. Taking someone's life and threatening them with terror to the point of submission is a completely different ball game.

Would you want one of these guys that specifically requests rape scenes from movies hanging out with your wife, girlfriend or daughter? On the other hand, the guy that looks at pink, well, hey... he's just like MOST of us.