That is actually very interesting.
You could use such a test if ever you were summoned to court, send it to the judge and to every member of the jury and people randomly selected among the audience by both the defense and prosecution attorney...
That's for the case, of course, where the model presented you with falsified ID...
Anyhow, the line is VERY fine and the male Homo-Sapiens standard of ultimate beauty, inbuilt in his DNA, aims for traits of a barely fertile female. That's how they maximize their probability of spreading their genes...
Re: my earlier forwarding of articles on the new definition of "child porn".
There is an hypocritical double standard: We titillate the public with 16 y.o. girls wearing transluscent clothes on the fashion runway but as soon as we openly portray them as *explicitely* sexual , then, it's verboten.
|