I believe (from my own results) that google does not place as heavily an emphasis on scripted links. Probably because so many of them don't actually go to the places they say they are going to go to so much % of the time...
__________________
<table border=0><tr><td><a href="http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=914009-0000&PA=303817&HTML=http://www.oliversmoney.com"><img src="http://66.230.141.41/images/banner/ok/referral/2.gif" border=0></a></td>
<td><font face=arial size=-1><b>Free content / hosted galleries</b>, 60% partnership: [<a href="http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=914009-0000&PA=303817&HTML=http://www.oliversmoney.com">Oliver's Money</a>]
<b>Gallery Spots</b> for sale, buy or sell traffic, link galleries for traffic: [<a href="http://www.chickentraffic.com/cttsv2/bin/traffic.cgi?:591:2013">GallerySpots.com</a>]
<b>$0.11 per blind click</b> sponsor, $0.11 / Free Download, $0.03 & $0.01 / Referral: [<a href="http://ucbill.com/ucbill/signupaffiliates.php?ref=juge">Purity Scan</a>]</font></td></tr></table>
|
Google algorithm change?
Linear Mode
