Judge Rules in Favor of Industry On 2257

It is alot to take in and some of which is above me in knowing fully the meanings
behind the present case though I noticed this part which had pointed out one thing
inwhich I am doing on the web. Maybe allot of other wms feel the same so I pulled
the following plug that seem to point out what I am doing for a sponsor,
eg;
buying content and building sites and going about my business.

It says;
"This is a blockbuster of a ruling! It appears to say that, for example, a content producer
which does not maintain its own websites but merely sells content to others is required
to keep 2257 records of the performers it hires, but the webmasters who post that material
on the Web are not. Further, in such a situation, the content producer is not required
to keep lists of any URLs, since none of the sites on which the materials appear are under
its control, and the webmasters, who are not "producers" under this ruling, also are not
required to keep lists of the URLs where the material appears, nor are they required to
keep the identification records."


Thank you for sharing and if I am wrong in thinking please correct me.

Have a great day,
Mark